• From: Dave Winer <dave@u...>
• To: xml-rpc@y...
• Date: Mon, 10 Sep 2001 18:31:28 -0700

Mark, thanks for the respectful pushback, but that's not true.

Much of the XML-RPC spec is devoted to explaining how to serialize values,
structs and lists.

If you were going to marshall your calls in a different format, you'd still
have to define and explain how serialization works.

This has long been overlooked in the REST-is-Better discussions. (Although I
have pointed it out before.)

Dave


----- Original Message -----
From: "Mark Baker" <distobj@a...>
To: "Dave Winer" <dave@u...>
Cc: <xml-rpc@y...>; <xml-dev@l...>;
<soapbuilders@y...>; "UserLand-Internal"
<UserLand-Internal@u...>
Sent: Monday, September 10, 2001 5:53 PM
Subject: [xml-rpc] Re: Infoworld's CTO on Web Services


> > http://www.infoworld.com/articles/op/xml/01/09/10/010910opconnection.xml
> >
> > Nice. ;->
>
> Heh.  Of course, if you buy into REST - the architecture of the Web - then
> the extra specifications necessary to implement Web Services total zero
lines.
> Can't do much better than that. 8-)
>
> MB
>
>
>
> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
>
>

• References:
  • Re: Infoworld's CTO on Web Services
    • From: Mark Baker <distobj@a...>

• Prev by Date: Re: Status on IE6 and XML Conformance
• Next by Date: Re: managing unknown values
• Previous by thread: Re: Infoworld's CTO on Web Services
• Next by thread: ANNOUNCE: Final Release of the new XML Spy 4.0 Suite is now available
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread