• From: james anderson <james.anderson@s...>
• Date: Fri, 07 Sep 2001 22:11:13 +0200

one problem with "expanded name" is that it leads to a term like
"expanded qualified name", which only makes matters worse.

Jeni Tennison wrote:
> 
> Hi Richard,
> 
> > Does any spec give a name to the (namespace name, local name) pair
> > that identifies an element or attribute? It's not a qualified name -
> > that's the string that appears in a document which is expanded into
> > such a pair by looking up the prefix or using the default namespace.
> 
> XPath 1.0 terms this an 'expanded name':
> 
>   "Some types of node also have an expanded-name, which is a pair
>    consisting of a local part and a namespace URI."
>                            http://www.w3.org/TR/xpath#dt-expanded-name
>

• References:
  • I need a name
    • From: Richard Tobin <richard@c...>
  • Re: I need a name
    • From: Jeni Tennison <mail@j...>

• Prev by Date: RE: I need a name
• Next by Date: RE: I need a name
• Previous by thread: Re: I need a name
• Next by thread: UName Re: I need a name
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread