Cart
[Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries]
Too bad the definition given is wrong in a very critical area, making the usual mistake of assuming a parser can/should dereference the URI given for the namespace. Dave Orchard -----Original Message----- From: Ronald Bourret [SMTP:rpbourret@r...] Sent: Wednesday, August 15, 2001 2:27 PM To: xml-dev Subject: Re: Namespaces Defined Outstanding. I think I'll refer to this from the Namespaces FAQ. Something along the lines of: <p>XML namespaces have cause a lot of <a href="URL from below">confusion</a>, which this FAQ hopes to help clear up.</p> ;) -- Ron Leigh Dodds wrote: > > ...or not: > > http://whatis.techtarget.com/definition/0,,sid9_gci213711,00.html > > Its no wonder there's confusion. > > L. > > -- > Leigh Dodds, Research Group, ingenta | "Pluralitas non est ponenda > http://weblogs.userland.com/eclectic | sine necessitate" > http://www.xml.com/pub/xmldeviant | -- William of Ockham > > ----------------------------------------------------------------- > The xml-dev list is sponsored by XML.org <http://www.xml.org>, an > initiative of OASIS <http://www.oasis-open.org> > > The list archives are at http://lists.xml.org/archives/xml-dev/ > > To subscribe or unsubscribe from this elist use the subscription > manager: <http://lists.xml.org/ob/adm.pl> -- Ronald Bourret Programming, Writing, and Training XML, Databases, and Schemas http://www.rpbourret.com ----------------------------------------------------------------- The xml-dev list is sponsored by XML.org <http://www.xml.org>, an initiative of OASIS <http://www.oasis-open.org> The list archives are at http://lists.xml.org/archives/xml-dev/ To subscribe or unsubscribe from this elist use the subscription manager: <http://lists.xml.org/ob/adm.pl>
|
