• From: "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <clbullar@i...>
• To: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@s...>, xml-dev@l...
• Date: Mon, 06 Aug 2001 11:10:23 -0500

Ok.  The statement I've heard most often 
repeated from the beginning of the commercial 
use of markup was that it would be a fine 
data transport syntax if mixed models 
were thrown away (pernicious to the parser 
although common the actual data).

That was it for common experience.  
So - - and /> pretty much summed it up.

Then we talked about throwing away DTDs 
and that went to hell but as we all knew 
and said often, they were too hard and 
bloated the parser.

Common experience depends on common roles, 
and they aren't common from cube to cube 
or even GUI to GUI.

Len 
http://www.mp3.com/LenBullard

Ekam sat.h, Vipraah bahudhaa vadanti.
Daamyata. Datta. Dayadhvam.h


-----Original Message-----
From: Simon St.Laurent [mailto:simonstl@s...]

Sure.  I'd love to hear from more people directly about their
experiences with such things.

• Prev by Date: RE: breaking up?
• Next by Date: 'Templates' in XML Schema?
• Previous by thread: RE: breaking up?
• Next by thread: RE: breaking up?
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread