• From: David Hunter <david.hunter@m...>
• To: "'Bullard, Claude L (Len)'" <clbullar@i...>, xml-dev@l...
• Date: Tue, 28 Aug 2001 15:59:18 -0400

For the sake of this discussion and analogy, yes, I'm treating tables like
elements, and columns like child elements.  And yes, my main point is that
there is no problem telling which <name> is which, because each belongs to a
parent element.

David

-----Original Message-----
From: Bullard, Claude L (Len) [mailto:clbullar@i...]
Sent: Tuesday, August 28, 2001 3:44 PM
To: David Hunter; xml-dev@l...
Subject: RE: Enlightenment via avoiding the T-word


You said it most succinctly here:

David Hunter:  "There is no problem, from the database, telling which "name"
is which, because
each is in it's own table."

Isn't that the same as saying a table is an element?

Len 
http://www.mp3.com/LenBullard

Ekam sat.h, Vipraah bahudhaa vadanti.
Daamyata. Datta. Dayadhvam.h

• Prev by Date: RE: Enlightenment via avoiding the T-word
• Next by Date: RE: Enlightenment via avoiding the T-word
• Previous by thread: Re: Enlightenment via avoiding the T-word
• Next by thread: RE: Enlightenment via avoiding the T-word
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread