[Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries]
Peter Piatko wrote: > So far on this list I've seen 2, well 2.5, interpretations: > > (1) A ulabel should have a 1-1 mapping to its "meaning" (a word I am being > intentionally vague about). Please let's not use the word "meaning". It's obviously only a part of the meaning. A content model is what a DTD maps a name to. Is the term "content model" broad enough to cover all of the cases we're talking about? Evan Lenz XYZFind Corp.
|

Cart



