• From: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@s...>
• To: xml-dev@l...
• Date: Tue, 21 Aug 2001 14:43:05 -0400

On 21 Aug 2001 14:06:45 -0400, John Cowan wrote:
>(comments should be discarded with the
> rest of the lexical cruft).

Cruft, eh?  

Maybe it's time for some of us lexically-oriented folks to get off our duffs and write some code. I've been excessively dependent on Infoset-oriented folks for plenty long-enough.

Coming soon...

Simon St.Laurent
http://simonstl.com

• References:
  • XInclude vs SAX vs validation
    • From: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@g...>
  • Re: XInclude vs SAX vs validation
    • From: David Brownell <david-b@p...>
  • Re: XInclude vs SAX vs validation
    • From: Elliotte Rusty Harold <elharo@m...>
  • Re: XInclude vs SAX vs validation
    • From: John Cowan <jcowan@r...>

• Prev by Date: Re: XInclude vs SAX vs validation
• Next by Date: Re: Namespaces,W3C XML Schema (was Re: ANN: SAX FiltersforNamespaceProcessing)
• Previous by thread: Re: XInclude vs SAX vs validation
• Next by thread: Re: XInclude vs SAX vs validation
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread