• From: David Brownell <david-b@p...>
• To: Gary Stephenson <garys@i...>
• Date: Wed, 15 Aug 2001 22:24:51 -0700

In particular, that the cut/paste was from the "2nd edition with errata"
document, which cross-references some of the changes.

Now, what I really want is a "current edition with errata", using
some publishing scheme where as errata are adopted, they're
immediately published and cross-linked as annotations ... :)

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "John Cowan" <cowan@m...>
To: "Gary Stephenson" <garys@i...>
Cc: <xml-dev@l...>
Sent: Wednesday, August 15, 2001 5:13 PM
Subject: Re: Conformance Test question


> Gary Stephenson scripsit:
> > Hi David and Richard,
> > 
> > Excuse my ignorance, but where does the [E109] in the below come from?
> 
> It means that this part of the text was corrected by erratum 109.
> 
> -- 
> John Cowan                                   cowan@c...

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: Conformance Test question
    • From: Gary Stephenson <garys@i...>

• References:
  • Re: Conformance Test question
    • From: John Cowan <cowan@m...>

• Prev by Date: Re: Character &#0;
• Next by Date: Re: Conformance Test question
• Previous by thread: Re: Conformance Test question
• Next by thread: Re: Conformance Test question
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread