• From: "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <clbullar@i...>
• To: Richard Tobin <richard@c...>, xml-dev@l...
• Date: Fri, 03 Aug 2001 12:35:58 -0500

What do you make of 

"5.5 I really like the HTML 3.2 specification, but would like to make some
changes, may I modify the 3.2 specification in a few places and redistribute
it? May I call it HTML 3.2.1?

No and no."?

They are also firm about derivative works in the context of their copyright
policies for 
documents, schemas, etc, and particularly concerned about XML and RDF where
these schemas 
are definitions (if they are non-normative, i'm not sure where that leads?).

Len 
http://www.mp3.com/LenBullard

Ekam sat.h, Vipraah bahudhaa vadanti.
Daamyata. Datta. Dayadhvam.h


-----Original Message-----
From: Richard Tobin [mailto:richard@c...]

There is a page about the "intellectual property" of the W3C at

  http://www.w3.org/Consortium/Legal/IPR-FAQ-20000620.html

• Prev by Date: RE: W3C Decision process (RE: ANN: SAX Filters for Namespace Proc essing)
• Next by Date: RE: ISO intellectual property (was Standards)
• Previous by thread: RE: ISO intellectual property (was Standards)
• Next by thread: RE: ISO intellectual property (was Standards)
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread