• From: Leigh Dodds <ldodds@i...>
• To: xml-dev@l...
• Date: Thu, 02 Aug 2001 11:34:05 +0100

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Patrick Ohl [mailto:Patrick.Ohl@o...]
> Sent: 02 August 2001 11:03
> To: xml-dev@l...
> Subject: Re: XMLLight - What do you think?

[...]

> Well, I just wrote my anwser to SUN's XML mailing list. But I have to
> admit that I think neither Announcements nor Cross-Postings are very
> apprechiated on XML-Dev.

Willful cross-posting always causes problems. However announcements 
on XML-DEV are not a problem, so long as they include a sufficient 
level of detail. Peter Murray Rust had the following to say on the 
matter:

"Please can announcements of commercial software include enough 
metadata (but not too much) to enable XML-DEVers to judge whether the 
link is worth exploring." [1]

"The primary criteria is that any announcements
(software/conferences/jobs/books etc.) be of general interest to the
XML-DEV community." [2]

[1]. http://lists.xml.org/archives/xml-dev/200005/msg00165.html
[2]. http://lists.xml.org/archives/xml-dev/200005/msg00176.html

Cheers,

L.


-- 
Leigh Dodds, Systems Architect       | "Pluralitas non est ponenda
http://weblogs.userland.com/eclectic |    sine necessitate"
http://www.xml.com/pub/xmldeviant    |     -- William of Ockham

• References:
  • Re: XMLLight - What do you think?
    • From: Patrick Ohl <Patrick.Ohl@o...>

• Prev by Date: Re: Why unqualified? (was RE: ANN: SAX Filters for NamespaceProcessing)
• Next by Date: Re: Use of XML ?
• Previous by thread: Re: XMLLight - What do you think?
• Next by thread: RE: XMLLight - What do you think?
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread