• From: Ajay K sanghi <sanghi@g...>
• To: Al Snell <alaric@a...>
• Date: Thu, 02 Aug 2001 07:34:44 +0530

The effort has to do with "programming vs mapping" even if "all" sides have
JVM and XML Parser.

Also, if you see my response, nowhere I use the word "XML". I use the term
"file-based" approach. The file may be in XML, EDI or proprietary format.
Note: we are an XML/EDI vendor, so "may" be i am biased.

Ajay




-----Original Message-----
From: Al Snell [mailto:alaric@a...]
Sent: Wednesday, August 01, 2001 10:17 PM
To: Ajay K sanghi
Cc: xml-dev@l...
Subject: RE: Use of XML ?


On Wed, 1 Aug 2001, Ajay K sanghi wrote:

> Also, consider efforts required in synchronising a change in the class.

1) s/class/DTD/

2) Requiring both sides to have an XML parser isn't *that* much less
restrictive then requiring both sides to have a JVM either :-)

>
> Ajay
>

ABS

--
                               Alaric B. Snell
 http://www.alaric-snell.com/  http://RFC.net/  http://www.warhead.org.uk/
   Any sufficiently advanced technology can be emulated in software

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: Use of XML ?
    • From: Caroline Clewlow <cclewlow@e...>

• References:
  • RE: Use of XML ?
    • From: Al Snell <alaric@a...>

• Prev by Date: SAX-ext proposal #1: standalone flag
• Next by Date: Re: SAX-ext proposals, first set
• Previous by thread: RE: Use of XML ?
• Next by thread: Re: Use of XML ?
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread