• From: Nicolas LEHUEN <nicolas.lehuen@u...>
• To: "'Fuchs, Matthew'" <matthew.fuchs@c...>,'Ronald Bourret' <rpbourret@r...>,"'xml-dev@l...'" <xml-dev@l...>
• Date: Thu, 30 Aug 2001 09:35:43 +0200

>Regarding validation vs. typing, validation is a kind of type-checking
>(constraints do specify types, just not all the types are 
>named).  However,
>in validation, you only ask if the document was correct, and 
>don't get to
>find out what the types were.
>
>Matthew

Yes, but as validation and typing are tightly bound in terms of algorithm,
why not perform them both in the same path, for the sheer sake of efficiency
? When validating, you collect a lot of useful data (you know what XSDL
types you are matching against elements), so why no keep this information in
a PSVI to give it to the next layer ?

Regards,
Nicolas

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: Enlightenment via avoiding the T-word
    • From: Ronald Bourret <rpbourret@r...>

• Prev by Date: RE: Enlightenment via avoiding the T-word
• Next by Date: Re: Enlightenment via avoiding the T-word
• Previous by thread: RE: Enlightenment via avoiding the T-word
• Next by thread: Re: Enlightenment via avoiding the T-word
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread