• From: Peter Piatko <piatko@r...>
• To: "Fuchs, Matthew" <matthew.fuchs@c...>,'Tim Bray' <tbray@t...>, xml-dev@l...
• Date: Wed, 29 Aug 2001 22:34:19 -0400

----- Original Message -----
From: "Fuchs, Matthew" <matthew.fuchs@c...>
To: "'Tim Bray'" <tbray@t...>; <xml-dev@l...>
Sent: Wednesday, August 29, 2001 4:11 PM
Subject: RE: Namespaces, schemas, Simon's filters.


> Likewise, one can consider the creation of a complexType as likewise
> creating a namespace (or asserting the existence of a namespace) whose
name
> is the concatenation of the enclosing namespace and the local name of the
> complexType (exact syntax open to discussion) and all elements declared
> immediately within it are in that namespace.

After finally glancing at the XML Schema: Formal Description document I
noticed that NUN's  (as you call them) are at least the beginnings of this
idea.  Are your thoughts in the same general vicinity?

Thanks,

Peter

• References:
  • RE: Namespaces, schemas, Simon's filters.
    • From: "Fuchs, Matthew" <matthew.fuchs@c...>

• Prev by Date: Re: Namespaces, schemas, Simon's filters.
• Next by Date: Re: Namespaces, schemas, Simon's filters.
• Previous by thread: Re: Namespaces, schemas, Simon's filters.
• Next by thread: RE: Namespaces, schemas, Simon's filters.
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread