• From: "David E. Cleary" <davec@p...>
• To: Xml-Dev <xml-dev@l...>
• Date: Thu, 23 Aug 2001 09:28:19 -0400

> complexity than this). Using local types made schema design and
> maintenance much simpler than if every element name in the schema had to
> be uniquely typed. But it it also makes it harder for me to comprehend
> correctly even the relatively small (1-2Kb) messages that we typcially
> deal with.

Maybe you do not use attributes, but if you do, do you have problems
comprehending them because typically they are not in a namespace? Why are
local element types different?

Dave

• References:
  • Re: Namespaces,W3C XML Schema (was Re: ANN: SAX FiltersforNamespaceProcessing)
    • From: Francis Norton <francis@r...>

• Prev by Date: Announcing RESTwiki
• Next by Date: RE: Why Are Schemas Hard?
• Previous by thread: Re: Namespaces,W3C XML Schema (was Re: ANN: SAX FiltersforNamespaceProcessing)
• Next by thread: Re: Namespaces,W3C XML Schema (was Re: ANN: SAX FiltersforNamespaceProcessing)
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread