Cart
[Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries]
Evan Lenz wrote: > Jonathan Borden wrote: > > > 1) and 2) are related. Taken together, a document composed of elements > > qualified by multiple namespaces should have a single > > _unprefixed_ namespace > > and multiple prefixed namespaces. > > Shouldn't this be labeled convention #3? There's nothing in #1 or #2 that > would forbid me from *always* using prefixes, right? Sure. Perhaps better "should have at most a single unprefixed namespace ..." > In any case, I would > personally be more neutral on whether people should or shouldn't use a > default namespace. It seems to be neither here nor there Right, I don't mean to suggest that default namespaces must be used, rather that each prefix (or lack of prefix) should specify _exactly one_ namespace in each document. More strongly one should not mix qualified unprefixed elements (i.e. default namespace) with unqualified elements (no namespace). Jonathan
|
