• From: Francis Norton <francis@r...>
• To: Rick Jelliffe <ricko@a...>
• Date: Wed, 29 Aug 2001 14:20:05 +0100

Rick Jelliffe wrote:
> 
> This is the architectural forms route. xsi:type.
> 
I think we just found a way of explaining architectural forms to anyone
who's been following this thread.

> Does this include the timing for downloading the new schema, and transforming
> it into your type annotator?
> 
No, I do those tasks at build time. They take *quite a bit* longer ... 

> > Yes, and given local types, push transforms can only be supported by
> > having access to at least some subset of the PSVI. I think the approach
> > above might hit the 20/80 point.
> 
> Which is to say that local types complicate push-processing and require unavailable
> and uninvented technology.
> 
True. For now. 

Francis.

• References:
  • RE: Enlightenment via avoiding the T-word
    • From: Nicolas LEHUEN <nicolas.lehuen@u...>
  • Re: Enlightenment via avoiding the T-word
    • From: Rick Jelliffe <ricko@a...>
  • Re: Enlightenment via avoiding the T-word
    • From: Francis Norton <francis@r...>
  • Re: Enlightenment via avoiding the T-word
    • From: Rick Jelliffe <ricko@a...>

• Prev by Date: RE: Enlightenment via avoiding the T-word
• Next by Date: RE: Enlightenment via avoiding the T-word
• Previous by thread: Re: Enlightenment via avoiding the T-word
• Next by thread: Re: Enlightenment via avoiding the T-word
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread