[Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries]

  • From: Al Snell <alaric@a...>
  • To: Nicolas LEHUEN <nicolas.lehuen@u...>
  • Date: Thu, 23 Aug 2001 16:27:16 +0100 (BST)

On Wed, 22 Aug 2001, Nicolas LEHUEN wrote:

> Give people a schema language that enables them to define XML datatypes as
> easily as they used to define C structs or Java or C++ classes, and a
> language in which you can easily use XPath expression as rvalues or lvalues,
> while being constrained by the schema, and voilà - no more binding is
> required. The document *IS* the data.

So using XML will be starting to tie people into using XML-specific tools,
rather than using whatever data model is most familiar or appropriate to
them? XML as an environment rather than the universal glue? Muhahah!

ABS

-- 
                               Alaric B. Snell
 http://www.alaric-snell.com/  http://RFC.net/  http://www.warhead.org.uk/
   Any sufficiently advanced technology can be emulated in software


Site Map | Privacy Policy | Terms of Use | Trademarks
Free Stylus Studio XML Training:
W3C Member