• From: "Fuchs, Matthew" <matthew.fuchs@c...>
• To: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@s...>, xml-dev@l...
• Date: Fri, 31 Aug 2001 10:40:14 -0700

Perhaps because there is often no single "best-practice" - I think I'd
expect you of all people to realize that.  Often what is most important is
there be consistent practice - the principle of least surprise, or something
like that.  Consistency is often more important than optimality.

Matthew

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Simon St.Laurent [mailto:simonstl@s...]
> Sent: Thursday, August 30, 2001 12:59 PM
> To: xml-dev@l...
> Subject: infinite depth to namespaces
> 
...
> 
> 
> Simple best-practice solutions are fairly easy to come up with, but
> seemingly just as easy to shoot down, suggesting that there 
> may never be
> consensus on these issues.
> 

• Follow-Ups:
  • RE: infinite depth to namespaces
    • From: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@s...>

• Prev by Date: RE: Combining external entities with DTDs
• Next by Date: RE: When To Use Schemas (Was RE: infinite depth to namespaces)
• Previous by thread: RE: infinite depth to namespaces
• Next by thread: RE: infinite depth to namespaces
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread