Cart
[Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries]
I knew if I read down this thread far enough Len would mention groves! And if he didn't I was going to... It seems like if you generalise Michael's notions of attaching generic annotations to the results of a parse you have a grove. And picking out the parts relevant to a particular application (or class of application) is a grove plan. I know there is a lot of baggage attached to that particular term, but I've seen suggestion of a similar mechanism appear time and again. Even in Simpleton circles. Cheers, L. > -----Original Message----- > From: Bullard, Claude L (Len) [mailto:clbullar@i...] > Sent: 28 August 2001 22:04 > To: Ronald Bourret; xml-dev@l... > Subject: RE: Enlightenment via avoiding the T-word > > > Sounds again suspiciously like grove plans. > > Len > http://www.mp3.com/LenBullard > > Ekam sat.h, Vipraah bahudhaa vadanti. > Daamyata. Datta. Dayadhvam.h > > > -----Original Message----- > From: Ronald Bourret [mailto:rpbourret@r...] > > Michael Brennan wrote: > > It is very typical for an XML application to want to associate certain > > metadata with XML information items to suit certain processing > needs. One > > can easily envision different metadata vocabularies to suit different > > domains. > > Very nicely put. > > And when you look at it this way, it's pretty clear that the the PSVI is > a mixture of several different sets of metadata. For example, what > complexType an element is supposed to be is different from whether it > can be validated by (converted to) that complexType. > > ----------------------------------------------------------------- > The xml-dev list is sponsored by XML.org <http://www.xml.org>, an > initiative of OASIS <http://www.oasis-open.org> > > The list archives are at http://lists.xml.org/archives/xml-dev/ > > To subscribe or unsubscribe from this elist use the subscription > manager: <http://lists.xml.org/ob/adm.pl>
|
