• From: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@s...>
• To: xml-dev@l...
• Date: Wed, 01 Aug 2001 11:59:10 -0400

On 01 Aug 2001 11:27:42 -0400, David E. Cleary wrote:
> If you use Simon's filter, then your assumptions would be correct. In fact,
> he is doing exactly what you thought Schema was doing and considered wrong.

Please note that I've written this code as a means of coping with other
people's practices.  I don't consider the use of unqualified elements in
qualified contexts (where that context affects the meaning of the
unqualified content) a good idea in any event.

Rather than just complaining, I though it a good idea to create tools
for dealing with what I see as a deeply unfortunate situation.

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: Namespaces,
    • From: David Brownell <david-b@p...>

• References:
  • RE: Namespaces,
    • From: "David E. Cleary" <davec@p...>

• Prev by Date: RE: Namespaces,W3C XML Schema (was Re: ANN: SAX FiltersforNamespaceProcessing)
• Next by Date: RE: Namespaces, W3C XML Schema (was Re: ANN: SAX FiltersforNamespaceProcessing)
• Previous by thread: RE: Namespaces,
• Next by thread: Re: Namespaces,
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread