Cart
[Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries]
For HLALs, it's vital. I would think that transforms to different target languages would be non-controversial. Downtranslation is the key to enabling authors to work in different levels of abstraction, or am I missing your point here? Len http://www.mp3.com/LenBullard Ekam sat.h, Vipraah bahudhaa vadanti. Daamyata. Datta. Dayadhvam.h -----Original Message----- From: Simon St.Laurent [mailto:simonstl@s...] On 30 Aug 2001 17:38:30 -0700, Michael Brennan wrote: > And none of the protestations on this list (or anywhere else) will ever stop > me from doing whatever transformations or filtering on a document instance > that suit my applications' needs. And if I need to, I'll even write a SAX > filter that changes element names! <shudder/> ;-) That's on my to-do list as well, promise! (Same for attributes.) It's pretty easy to modify the namespace filter rules to change element names in-addition-to/in-place-of modifying the namespace. It's occasionally useful for transforms between similar vocabularies, like a single abstract vocabulary expressed in different natural languages. As always, at your own risk...
|
