• From: "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <clbullar@i...>
• To: Tim Bray <tbray@t...>, xml-dev@l...
• Date: Wed, 29 Aug 2001 13:48:20 -0500

That's a fact. Only systems are "meaningful".

Len 
http://www.mp3.com/LenBullard

Ekam sat.h, Vipraah bahudhaa vadanti.
Daamyata. Datta. Dayadhvam.h


-----Original Message-----
From: Tim Bray [mailto:tbray@t...]


At 08:20 AM 28/08/01 -0500, Bullard, Claude L (Len) wrote:
>The more I see new terms such as "ulabel" and oddities 
>such as "t*pe* to explain what markup is about given 
>that the problem is actually no one quite knows what 
>namespaces are about, I have to wonder.  Obscurity is 
>hard to hide.

Markup isn't *about* anything.  Namespaces aren't
*about* anything.  They are labels.  They provide part
of the infrastructure you need to build edifices of 
schemaware and displayware and ebizware and so on.

• Prev by Date: RE: Enlightenment via avoiding the T-word
• Next by Date: RE: Namespaces, schemas, Simon's filters.
• Previous by thread: RE: An open plea to the W3C (was Re: XInclude vs SAX vs
• Next by thread: RE: An open plea to the W3C (was Re: XInclude vs SAX vs
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread