• From: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@s...>
• To: "Champion, Mike" <Mike.Champion@S...>
• Date: Thu, 23 Aug 2001 14:11:42 -0400

On 23 Aug 2001 13:13:32 -0400, Champion, Mike wrote:
> The default solution is to keep piling on the complexity until W3C process
> collapses under its weight (arguably, it already has!), and then let someone
> else come along and carve "Java" our of our "C++".  I hope that we can be
> more pro-active and do what needs to be done before 20:20 hindsight makes it
> obvious what SHOULD have been done. 

I figure the "default solution" will happen eventually - I just worry
about the interval between the pile-up and the carving.

That, and lots of people still use C++ and many of them bear the scars.

• References:
  • RE: An open plea to the W3C (was Re: XInclude vs SAX vs validatio n)
    • From: "Champion, Mike" <Mike.Champion@S...>

• Prev by Date: RE: Namespaces, W3C XML Schema (was Re: ANN: SAX Filters forNamespaceProcessing)
• Next by Date: RE: building an XML DOM Parser
• Previous by thread: RE: An open plea to the W3C (was Re: XInclude vs SAX vs validatio n)
• Next by thread: Re: An open plea to the W3C (was Re: XInclude vs SAX vs validatio n)
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread