• From: "Champion, Mike" <Mike.Champion@S...>
• To: xml-dev@l...
• Date: Wed, 29 Aug 2001 14:09:14 -0400

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Simon St.Laurent [mailto:simonstl@s...]
> Sent: Wednesday, August 29, 2001 1:05 PM
> To: xml-dev@l...
> Subject: semantic overloading
> 
> 
> The W3C has just released a Working Draft of XML Accessibility
> Guidelines:
> http://www.w3.org/TR/xmlgl

 
> It's some genuinely interesting stuff.

Yes! We rant at the W3C a lot here, but this document is clear, concise, and
obviously based on a lot of practical experience.  I'm sure the authors are
a lot more enamored of the Semantic Web than I am, but their metadata
suggestions are sensible and help illuminate the real potential of RDF.
Likewise, the suggestions for keeping markup easily processable by
script/CSS/XSLT and making it easily portable to a variety of display
devices seem like "best practice" advice that we can all take seriously.

• Prev by Date: Re: Namespaces? (was: Enlightenment via avoiding the T-word)
• Next by Date: RE: How to specify a Processing Instruction? (better: how to cont rolencoding on saving)
• Previous by thread: semantic overloading
• Next by thread: RE: semantic overloading
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread