• From: Paul Prescod <paulp@A...>
• To: xml-dev@l...
• Date: Mon, 27 Aug 2001 18:45:39 -0700

Michael Brennan wrote:
> 
>...
> 
> SOAP and WSDL do not do any type conversions. 

You are right that WSDL does not force you to convert XML elements into
particular language-specific bit patterns. Nevertheless, WSDL uses XML
schema as a type abstraction and not necessarily as a validation tool.

"A message binding describes how the abstract content is mapped into a
concrete format." In that sense, WSDL implementations do a conversion
(mapping) from concrete elements (or more precisely, bits on a wire) to
types. I find this aspect of WSDL somewhat strange (using a schema
language for a transfer syntax as an abstract type system), but that's
life.

Other than that, I think we are in agreement. 
-- 
Take a recipe. Leave a recipe.  
Python Cookbook!  http://www.ActiveState.com/pythoncookbook

• References:
  • RE: Enlightenment via avoiding the T-word
    • From: Michael Brennan <Michael_Brennan@a...>

• Prev by Date: Expanding entity references using the DOM implementation
• Next by Date: RE: Enlightenment via avoiding the T-word
• Previous by thread: RE: Enlightenment via avoiding the T-word
• Next by thread: RE: Enlightenment via avoiding the T-word
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread