• From: Elliotte Rusty Harold <elharo@m...>
• To: xml-dev@l...
• Date: Mon, 23 Jul 2001 11:59:44 -0400

At 10:39 AM -0400 7/23/01, Ann Navarro wrote:

>To the first:
>
>I can write an XHTML 1.1 document that contains only features of XHTML 1.0, is it wrong to use the XHTML 1.1 doctype? Is it wrong to call a document XHTML 1.0 Transitional when it only uses Strict features?
>

This is a totally different situation. In fact, it's exactly the opposite. XHTML 1.1 is very close to a subset of XHTML 1.0. If I recall correctly, aside from xml:lang and perhaps xml:space, it is a subset. XHTML 1.0 Strict is a subset of XHTML 1.0 transitional.

Blueberry is a superset of XML 1.0, not a subset.

-- 

+-----------------------+------------------------+-------------------+
| Elliotte Rusty Harold | elharo@m... | Writer/Programmer |
+-----------------------+------------------------+-------------------+ 
|          The XML Bible, 2nd Edition (Hungry Minds, 2001)           |
|              http://www.ibiblio.org/xml/books/bible2/              |
|   http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ISBN=0764547607/cafeaulaitA/   |
+----------------------------------+---------------------------------+
|  Read Cafe au Lait for Java News:  http://www.cafeaulait.org/      | 
|  Read Cafe con Leche for XML News: http://www.ibiblio.org/xml/     |
+----------------------------------+---------------------------------+

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: Blueberry is not "closed" (was: Closing Blueberry)
    • From: Ann Navarro <ann@w...>

• References:
  • Re: Blueberry is not "closed" (was: Closing Blueberry)
    • From: Ann Navarro <ann@w...>

• Prev by Date: AW: XML Schema - define a type
• Next by Date: Newbie question: XML design for configuration file
• Previous by thread: Re: Blueberry is not "closed" (was: Closing Blueberry)
• Next by thread: Re: Blueberry is not "closed" (was: Closing Blueberry)
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread