[Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries]

  • From: James Clark <jjc@j...>
  • To: Tim Bray <tbray@t...>, xml-dev@l...
  • Date: Thu, 19 Jul 2001 08:02:52 +0700


> - James Clark proposed massively fewer restrictions
>   on the composition of names.  On the other hand,
>   there were some pretty strong arguments against this.

I didn't exactly propose getting rid of the restrictions.  Rather I 
proposed that they should be distinguished from other well-formedness 
errors (or moved from well-formedness into some new layer) so that they 
didn't cause fatal errors.  The arguments I remember were arguing why the 
restrictions were good (which I agree with not) not why they should be part 
of well-formedness.

James


Site Map | Privacy Policy | Terms of Use | Trademarks
Free Stylus Studio XML Training:
W3C Member