• From: David Brownell <david-b@p...>
• To: Michael Brennan <Michael_Brennan@a...>
• Date: Thu, 12 Jul 2001 16:50:33 -0700

>  Of course, it would be even
> better to see validators implemented as SAX filters, so the programmer can
> exercise more control. The only one I've seen implemented this way is James
> Clark's RELAX NG validator, though I haven't attempted an exhaustive survey.

What, you mean you missed the original?

http://xmlconf.sourceforge.net/java/apidoc/gnu/xml/pipeline/ValidationConsumer.html

Does standard DTD validation.

I should look at that RelaxNG validator; the previous validator (from
that family) which I saw used XSLT.

- Dave

• References:
  • RE: SAX2 ... missing features?
    • From: Michael Brennan <Michael_Brennan@a...>

• Prev by Date: RE: SAX2 ... missing features?
• Next by Date: RE: Just a Little Explanaton for Veering (RE: Blueberry/Unicode/ XML)
• Previous by thread: RE: SAX2 ... missing features?
• Next by thread: RE: SAX2 ... missing features?
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread