• From: John Cowan <cowan@m...>
• To: Joel Rees <rees@m...>
• Date: Mon, 09 Jul 2001 07:45:14 -0400 (EDT)

Joel Rees scripsit:

> As to whether an intermediate XML 1.1 is justifiable or not, I have no
> opinion. But I would strongly encourage including the extensions for UNICODE
> 3.1 in XML 2.0, and there are some minor details, like the middle-dot issue,
> where the UNICODE specification should not just simply be incorporated as
> is.

Actually, the Unicode definition of an identifier (on which the current
tentative Blueberry plan is designed) does allow KATAKANA MIDDLE DOT;
its General Category is Pc (Punctuation, connective) which is allowed
at all non-initial locations.

-- 
John Cowan                                   cowan@c...
One art/there is/no less/no more/All things/to do/with sparks/galore
	--Douglas Hofstadter

• References:
  • Re: XML Blueberry (non-ASCII name characters in Japan)
    • From: Joel Rees <rees@s...>

• Prev by Date: Re: How many XML gurus does it take to change a light bulb?
• Next by Date: Re: Accepting non-deterministic content models
• Previous by thread: Re: XML Blueberry (non-ASCII name characters in Japan)
• Next by thread: Re: XML Blueberry (non-ASCII name characters in Japan)
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread