• From: David Brownell <david-b@p...>
• To: John Cowan <cowan@m...>
• Date: Sat, 07 Jul 2001 15:59:39 -0700

> > I suspect that we're probably not going to get a more useful
> > formal XML data model for maintaining such consistency
> > than what Infoset delivers.  It's better than the XML 1.0 spec
> > for that purpose, even with its current omissions.
> 
> Yup.  We are, after all, dealing with SGML, devised by a lawyer
> from a common-law (i.e. explicitly anti-theoretical) tradition.

Talk about viral propagation of memes ... :)

• References:
  • Re: Infoset as subset of useful
    • From: John Cowan <cowan@m...>

• Prev by Date: RE: How many XML gurus does it take to change a light bulb?
• Next by Date: DOM in c
• Previous by thread: Re: Infoset as subset of useful
• Next by thread: Re: Infoset as subset of useful
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread