• From: Lars Marius Garshol <larsga@g...>
• To: xml-dev@l...
• Date: Fri, 06 Jul 2001 15:54:13 +0200

* Mike.Champion@S...
| 
| I hope you're right, but what's the evidence for your assertion that
| the W3C is looking at ways to "disable such noise"?  There are
| "comment information items" in the latest InfoSet draft ...

* John Cowan
| 
| They made us keep them/We didn't wanna do it/We didn't wanna do it...

I've always been very curious to know what the rationale for that
is. To me, a major part of what the infoset was supposed to be about
was to draw the line between logically significant information and
purely lexical information. The current version fails to achieve this.

--Lars M.

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: SAX LexicalHandler::comment issue
    • From: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@s...>
  • Re: SAX LexicalHandler::comment issue
    • From: John Cowan <cowan@m...>

• References:
  • Re: SAX LexicalHandler::comment issue
    • From: John Cowan <cowan@m...>

• Prev by Date: Re: SAX LexicalHandler::comment issue
• Next by Date: Re: SAX LexicalHandler::comment issue
• Previous by thread: Re: SAX LexicalHandler::comment issue
• Next by thread: Re: SAX LexicalHandler::comment issue
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread