[Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries]

  • From: Steven Noels <stevenn@o...>
  • To: "Xml-Dev (E-mail)" <xml-dev@l...>
  • Date: Tue, 03 Jul 2001 23:15:58 +0200

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Jeff Lowery [mailto:jlowery@s...]
> Sent: dinsdag 3 juli 2001 23:01
> To: 'Steven Noels'
> Cc: Xml-Dev (E-mail)
> Subject: RE: XML DOM
>
>
> Yep, I understand DOM is an interface spec.
>
> I own an MS-published book (that for reasons of potential culpability will
> remain nameless), that, on page 227, has a diagram labeled "The
> relationship
> between the W3C DOM object interfaces", with interfaces such as
> "IXMLDOMNode" and "IXMLDOMDocument" shown. These look like COM interfaces,
> so I expect it is an error to blame W3C for this.
>

Whether W3C should be blamed for DOM or not, is another discussion :-)

But IXMLDOMNode et al. is definitely MS-speak.

Regards,

</Steven>
outerthought.org


  • References:
Site Map | Privacy Policy | Terms of Use | Trademarks
Free Stylus Studio XML Training:
W3C Member