[Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries]
Bullard, Claude L (Len) wrote: > Or one could say as some seem to be that XML is not > the commons. It is a product wholly owned by a > consortium with its own customers and requirements. Shhhh. > Why not push Blueberry off to SGML? > Bigger kids; bigger car. Real commons. > That would make it ISO's problem. There wouldn't be anything to do: just write yourself a new SGML declaration, that's all. It's because the SGMLDECL is hard-coded in XML that this kind of change control is required. -- There is / one art || John Cowan <jcowan@r...> no more / no less || http://www.reutershealth.com to do / all things || http://www.ccil.org/~cowan with art- / lessness \\ -- Piet Hein
|

Cart



