[Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries]

  • From: John Cowan <jcowan@r...>
  • To: "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <clbullar@i...>
  • Date: Mon, 09 Jul 2001 17:35:15 -0400

Bullard, Claude L (Len) wrote:


> Or one could say as some seem to be that XML is not
> the commons.  It is a product wholly owned by a 
> consortium with its own customers and requirements. 


Shhhh.

 
> Why not push Blueberry off to SGML?   
> Bigger kids; bigger car.  Real commons. 
> That would make it ISO's problem.

There wouldn't be anything to do: just write yourself a new SGML

declaration, that's all.  It's because the SGMLDECL is
hard-coded in XML that this kind of change control
is required.

-- 
There is / one art             || John Cowan <jcowan@r...>
no more / no less              || http://www.reutershealth.com
to do / all things             || http://www.ccil.org/~cowan
with art- / lessness           \\ -- Piet Hein


Site Map | Privacy Policy | Terms of Use | Trademarks
Free Stylus Studio XML Training:
W3C Member