• From: Paul Cody Johnston <pcj@s...>
• To: "HUGHES,MARK (Non-HP-FtCollins,ex1)" <mark_hughes@n...>
• Date: Mon, 30 Jul 2001 18:01:04 -0700

I agree with Mark's statements about gzip: it's standard and works
great.  Any hopes for Binary XML should forget about the compression
angle -- there's no need to invent a binary XML standard to solve
compression problems, it's already been tackled.

However, I do think binary XML has promise in line with the notion of
"compiled data", especially as it relates to validation.  It's natural
for me to imagine a sort-of "expendable" or "temporary" pre-validated
binary rendering that can be ripped from the "master" XML document and
used as a cached or internal format for certain applications.  Seems
like that would be a useful tool for application builders that
warrants general research.  Not currently popular though! Many people
seem to have a visceral (irrational?) opposition to the very thought
of binary XML.

Just my two cents,
Paul

+---------------+---------------+------------------+
| Paul Johnston | pcj@i... | http://inxar.org |
+---------------+---------------+------------------+ 
  

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: Request: Techniques for reducing the size of XML instances
    • From: Al Snell <alaric@a...>

• References:
  • RE: Request: Techniques for reducing the size of XML instances
    • From: "HUGHES,MARK (Non-HP-FtCollins,ex1)" <mark_hughes@n...>

• Prev by Date: ANN: SAX Filters for Namespace Processing
• Next by Date: Re: ANN: SAX Filters for Namespace Processing
• Previous by thread: RE: Request: Techniques for reducing the size of XML instances
• Next by thread: Re: Request: Techniques for reducing the size of XML instances
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread