• From: Joel Rees <rees@s...>
• To: Jonathan Borden <jborden@m...>,John Cowan <jcowan@r...>
• Date: Thu, 12 Jul 2001 15:48:34 +0900

> Jonathan Borden wrote:

[snipped]

> Well, I guess this gets back to the fact that all vocabularies are
local...

This is the pith of the matter. How can we keep the vocabularies local?

Joel

• References:
  • DTD Notation
    • From: "Boyse, Jim" <Jim_Boyse@f...>
  • Re: DTD Notation
    • From: Deborah Aleyne Lapeyre <dalapeyre@m...>
  • Re: DTD Notation raises a question
    • From: Rod Davison <rdavison@s...>
  • Re: DTD Notation raises a question
    • From: John Cowan <jcowan@r...>
  • Synonyms and namespaces was: Re: DTD Notation raises a question
    • From: Jonathan Borden <jborden@m...>
  • Re: Synonyms and namespaces was: Re: DTD Notation raises a question
    • From: John Cowan <jcowan@r...>
  • Re: Synonyms and namespaces was: Re: DTD Notation raises a question
    • From: Jonathan Borden <jborden@m...>

• Prev by Date: Re: participating communities (was XML Blueberry)
• Next by Date: Re: XML Blueberry (non-ASCII name characters in Japan)
• Previous by thread: Re: Synonyms and namespaces was: Re: DTD Notation raises a question
• Next by thread: Re: DTD Notation raises a question
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread