• From: Dimiter Naydenov <bluelight@o...>
• To: xml-dev <xml-dev@l...>
• Date: Mon, 09 Jul 2001 19:35:17 +0300

Well, this is definitely not true:

> Most servers are *NIX and their stability is
> uncomparable to NT/win2k.  Definitelly MS has the
> marketing power to convince the clueless like Claude
> otherwise.

Lets not begin with the old quarrel "whose is the best". Windows as well as
*NIX has its good and its bad sides. Statements like "xxx is the
best/fastest/most stable of all OSes" have proven to cause endless (and
useless) debates. NT/2K servers are as stable as most  *NIX implementations.
Which to choose depends on the particular requirements, environment,
compatibility issues, etc. And last but not least - the personal preference.

Regards,
Dimiter

• Prev by Date: Re: XML Blueberry (non-ASCII name characters in Japan)
• Next by Date: RE: OS other than Win
• Previous by thread: RE: OS other than Win
• Next by thread: RE: OS other than Win
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread