• From: David Brownell <david-b@p...>
• To: Nicolas LEHUEN <nicolas.lehuen@u...>
• Date: Thu, 05 Jul 2001 10:51:34 -0700

> JUnit seems to form a consensus as the unit testing framework for Java code.

It's gotten a certain amount of attention, but given many folk have
decided _not_ to use it, that clearly can't be true.


> - A kind of SAXAsserter that would compare two SAX event flow for equality
> (two threads pushing SAX events on the same asserter)

The simple way to do that is to canonicalize into text and then compare
the output. This is what the SAX/XML conformance suite does (at
http://xmlconf.sourceforge.net/java) when seeing how well a SAX
parser meets "generate correct output for valid XML" requirements.

- Dave

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: XML and unit testing
    • From: Lars Marius Garshol <larsga@g...>

• References:
  • RE: XML and unit testing
    • From: Nicolas LEHUEN <nicolas.lehuen@u...>

• Prev by Date: RE: SAX LexicalHandler::comment issue
• Next by Date: RE: Some clarificatiosn -- RE: [Question] How to do incremental p arsing?
• Previous by thread: RE: XML and unit testing
• Next by thread: Re: XML and unit testing
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread