• From: Eric Bohlman <ebohlman@e...>
• To: Joel Rees <rees@m...>, xml-dev@l...
• Date: Tue, 24 Jul 2001 01:53:00 -0500

7/24/01 12:56:44 AM, Joel Rees <rees@s...> wrote:

>The practical mathematician in me wonders why such a thing should require
>pretense. <observation>While it is true that good design often wears
>well</observation>, <axiom>no artifact of mortal beings can hope to undure
                                                                     ^^^^^^ 
>long unchanged</axiom>.

This strikes me as a rather useful, if accidentally created, neologism and in fact the axiom could be 
rewritten as <axiom>any artifact of mortal beings will undure rather than endure</axiom>.

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: Blueberry is not "closed" (was: Closing Blueberry)
    • From: Joel Rees <rees@s...>

• Prev by Date: Re: Blueberry is not "closed" (was: Closing Blueberry)
• Next by Date: Re: Blueberry is not "closed" (was: Closing Blueberry)
• Previous by thread: Re: Blueberry is not "closed" (was: Closing Blueberry)
• Next by thread: Re: Blueberry is not "closed" (was: Closing Blueberry)
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread