• From: "HUGHES,MARK (Non-HP-FtCollins,ex1)" <mark_hughes@n...>
• To: "'xml-dev@l...'" <xml-dev@l...>
• Date: Tue, 31 Jul 2001 11:42:36 -0700

>From: Paul Cody Johnston [mailto:pcj@s...]
>However, I do think binary XML has promise in line with the notion of
>"compiled data", especially as it relates to validation.  It's natural
>for me to imagine a sort-of "expendable" or "temporary" pre-validated

  That's an excellent point - passing around a tokenized form of an XML
document to simplify parsing is a reasonable idea.  Personally, I'd just
use the Pyxie format <http://www.pyxie.org/>, as it's *VERY* easy to
produce and to parse again, and has the tremendous advantage of still
being plain-text, so it's easy to debug and test.

-- <a href="http://kuoi.asui.uidaho.edu/~kamikaze/"> Mark Hughes </a>

• Follow-Ups:
  • RE: Request: Techniques for reducing the size of XML instances
    • From: Al Snell <alaric@a...>

• Prev by Date: Re: SAX2 bugs -- please file!
• Next by Date: RE: Blueberry/Unicode/XML
• Previous by thread: RE: Request: Techniques for reducing the size of XML instances
• Next by thread: RE: Request: Techniques for reducing the size of XML instances
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread