• From: Richard Tobin <richard@c...>
• To: roblugt@e...
• Date: Fri, 20 Jul 2001 14:32:43 +0100 (BST)

>Oh, I see what you mean.  So even though the "S" production hasn't changed,
>processors (that normalise late) are forced to change their implementation
>of the "S" production or risk being non-conformant.  I don't think this is a
>very honest change do you?  I would prefer the xml spec to be consistent
>without hidden inferences like that.

I quite agree.  You can take it as an argument that if we change the
line-end characters we might as well change the S production to match,
and should do so to avoid confusion.

-- Richard

• References:
  • Re: Closing Blueberry
    • From: Rob Lugt <roblugt@e...>

• Prev by Date: Re: Closing Blueberry
• Next by Date: Re: Collected Works of SAX
• Previous by thread: Re: Closing Blueberry
• Next by thread: Re: Closing Blueberry
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread