• From: Nicolas LEHUEN <nicolas.lehuen@u...>
• To: "'Bullard, Claude L (Len)'" <clbullar@i...>,'Jonathan Borden ' <jborden@m...>, 'Peter Flynn ' <peter@s...>
• Date: Mon, 02 Jul 2001 09:01:03 +0200

Yeah, I thought about it after sending my message... I should be funny to
see how many pompous acronyms we can find, finally :). We're creating words
and acronyms like we used to handle dates long before Y2K : why worry about
the future ? Let's use very generic terms and let our followers do the job
of finding free places in the name space !

Regards,
Nicolas

>-----Message d'origine-----
>De : Bullard, Claude L (Len) [mailto:clbullar@i...]
>Envoyé : dimanche 1 juillet 2001 22:32
>À : Nicolas LEHUEN; 'Jonathan Borden '; 'Peter Flynn '
>Cc : 'xml-dev@l... '
>Objet : RE: SchemaTA (was: Newbie)
>
>
>Or like 
>
>the HyperText Markup Language (HTML)?
>
>Len
>http://www.mp3.com/LenBullard
>
>Ekam sat.h, Vipraah bahudhaa vadanti.
>Daamyata. Datta. Dayadhvam.h
>
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: Nicolas LEHUEN [mailto:nicolas.lehuen@u...]
>
>Or if a less generic term had been chosen. Why not call it 
>"The One And Only
>One XML Schema Definition Language" (TOAOOXMLSDL), while we're at it ?
>
>It's a bit like if a programming language was named 
>"Programming Language"
>-- it's a blatant namespace pollution :). Now we have to cope 
>with it by
>specifying "W3C XML Schema schemata" or other graceful expressions...
>

• Prev by Date: Re: Is this premitted ?
• Next by Date: Re: Is this premitted ?
• Previous by thread: Re: SchemaTA (was: Newbie)
• Next by thread: the need for document type name (was: Define a root in a DTD)
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread