• From: Sean McGrath <sean.mcgrath@p...>
• To: xml-dev@l...
• Date: Sat, 07 Jul 2001 17:08:58 +0100

Q. How many XML gurus does it take to change a light bulb?

A. Eight:

1 to create a syntax for expressing light bulbs

2 to create broadly similar yet different APIs for interacting with light bulbs

1 to argue that the API differences can be resolved by splitting the 
universe of light bulb applications into
physical-model and logical-model camps.

1 to argue that no single, cohesive model is possible.

1 to disagree and invent yet another "gee! all light bulbs can be though of 
it terms of nodes and arcs" model.

1 to question the sanity of all this and just get stuff working by hacking 
simple lightbulb instances
into relational databases and processing them with Perl.

1 to write the meta-light-bulb joke about it and post it on xml-dev

Sean

• Follow-Ups:
  • RE: How many XML gurus does it take to change a light bulb?
    • From: Don Park <donpark@d...>
  • RE: How many XML gurus does it take to change a light bulb?
    • From: Stuart Naylor <indtec@e...>
  • RE: How many XML gurus does it take to change a light bulb?
    • From: "Robert C. Lyons" <boblyons@u...>

• References:
  • Re: filtering noise (was Re: SAX LexicalHandler::comment issue)
    • From: Sean McGrath <sean.mcgrath@p...>
  • Re: filtering noise (was Re: SAX LexicalHandler::comment issue)
    • From: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@s...>
  • Re: filtering noise (was Re: SAX LexicalHandler::comment issue)
    • From: Peter Flynn <peter@s...>

• Prev by Date: Re: filtering noise (was Re: SAX LexicalHandler::comment issue)
• Next by Date: Re: XML Blueberry (non-ASCII name characters in Japan)
• Previous by thread: Re: filtering noise (was Re: SAX LexicalHandler::comment issue)
• Next by thread: RE: How many XML gurus does it take to change a light bulb?
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread