• From: John Cowan <cowan@m...>
• To: Bjoern Hoehrmann <derhoermi@g...>
• Date: Sun, 22 Jul 2001 18:30:34 -0400 (EDT)

Bjoern Hoehrmann scripsit:

> As per RFC 2396, the difference between an URI and an URI reference is,
> that the URI reference allows an additional fragment identifier attached
> to the URI. 

A URI reference may also be relative to the current base, whereas a URI
is always absolute.  The intent here is to permit both relative and absolute
forms, but not fragment identifiers.

-- 
John Cowan                                   cowan@c...
One art/there is/no less/no more/All things/to do/with sparks/galore
	--Douglas Hofstadter

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: URI vs. URI reference for system identifiers
    • From: Bjoern Hoehrmann <derhoermi@g...>

• References:
  • URI vs. URI reference for system identifiers
    • From: Bjoern Hoehrmann <derhoermi@g...>

• Prev by Date: URI vs. URI reference for system identifiers
• Next by Date: Re: URI vs. URI reference for system identifiers
• Previous by thread: URI vs. URI reference for system identifiers
• Next by thread: Re: URI vs. URI reference for system identifiers
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread