• From: Murata Makoto <mura034@a...>
• To: xml-dev@l...
• Date: Sun, 08 Jul 2001 12:15:06 +0900

Rick Jelliffe wrote:

>Of these, most are CJK Unified Ideographs Extension B.  These are characters
>which must be considered bad practise for use in markup, perhaps with some
>exceptions.   They are mostly characters which readers may easily find
>confusing,
>being archaic, regional, variant, uncommon or non-interoperable.

This is completely different from what I have heard from CJK experts.  Do you 
have any supporting evidence?

Cheers,

Makoto

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: XML Blueberry
    • From: Elliotte Rusty Harold <elharo@m...>
  • Re: XML Blueberry (long response on CJK background)
    • From: Rick Jelliffe <ricko@a...>

• Prev by Date: RE: XML Blueberry
• Next by Date: [DOM] nodeName
• Previous by thread: RE: XML Blueberry
• Next by thread: Re: XML Blueberry
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread