• From: Ann Navarro <ann@w...>
• To: Elliotte Rusty Harold <elharo@m...>, xml-dev@l...
• Date: Mon, 23 Jul 2001 15:46:55 -0400

At 03:09 PM 7/23/2001 -0400, Elliotte Rusty Harold wrote:
>At 2:24 PM -0400 7/23/01, Ann Navarro wrote:
>
> >Correct. But are you not arguing that a member of the subset not be able 
> to claim membership in the superset unless it uses a feature outside the 
> intersection?
> >
>
>Yes, that's precisely what I'm arguing. I think that's the most 
>compatible, least painful approach.

How to you propose to prohibit it in a validating fashion?

Ann



Ann Navarro, WebGeek Inc.
http://www.webgeek.com/
Now in print! Effective Web Design, 2nd Edition
http://www.webgeek.com/books/
What's on my mind? http://www.snorf.net/blog/	

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: Blueberry is not "closed" (was: Closing Blueberry)
    • From: Elliotte Rusty Harold <elharo@m...>

• References:
  • Re: Blueberry is not "closed" (was: Closing Blueberry)
    • From: Ann Navarro <ann@w...>
  • Re: Blueberry is not "closed" (was: Closing Blueberry)
    • From: Ann Navarro <ann@w...>
  • Re: Blueberry is not "closed" (was: Closing Blueberry)
    • From: Elliotte Rusty Harold <elharo@m...>

• Prev by Date: Re: Question re: unwanted whitespace and html output
• Next by Date: Re: Blueberry is not "closed" (was: Closing Blueberry)
• Previous by thread: Re: Blueberry is not "closed" (was: Closing Blueberry)
• Next by thread: Re: Blueberry is not "closed" (was: Closing Blueberry)
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread