• From: David Megginson <david@m...>
• To: xml-dev@l...
• Date: Sat, 03 Mar 2001 20:33:15 -0500

Charles Reitzel writes:

 > Proposal: let's give XPath the SAX treatment.

I'd actually recommend giving XPath the DOM treatment.  Well, not
really DOM, but maybe a cleaner, in-memory tree.  XPaths (even hairy
ones) are extremely small, and the same path object is likely to be
reused many times, so I see no need to force the pain of an
event-based interface on users (unless someone thinks we're going to
be seeing gigabyte-long XPath expressions).


All the best,


David

-- 
David Megginson                 david@m...
           http://www.megginson.com/

• Follow-Ups:
  • re: We need an XPath API
    • From: Robin Berjon <robin@k...>

• References:
  • We need an XPath API
    • From: Charles Reitzel <creitzel@m...>

• Prev by Date: Re: RSS 1.0 vs. RSS 0.9*
• Next by Date: re: We need an XPath API
• Previous by thread: Re: We need an XPath API
• Next by thread: re: We need an XPath API
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread