• From: "Clark C. Evans" <cce@c...>
• To: "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <clbullar@i...>
• Date: Thu, 01 Mar 2001 15:47:30 -0500 (EST)

On Thu, 1 Mar 2001, Bullard, Claude L (Len) wrote:
> I like the RDDL idea because it allows one 
> to locate alternatives, but will that scale 
> and perform?

I would predict that usage of a few select, and very common
extension functions will be very performant; as the xsl
processor can cashe the proper implementation.  If a
script uses a ton of not-so-standard extension functions
from all over the internet, then perhaps not...

;) Clark

• References:
  • RE: [xsl] ANNOUNCE: Petition to withdraw xsl:script from XSLT 1.1
    • From: "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <clbullar@i...>

• Prev by Date: RE: [xsl] ANNOUNCE: Petition to withdraw xsl:script from XSLT 1.1
• Next by Date: Re: [xsl] ANNOUNCE: Petition to withdraw xsl:script from XSLT 1.1
• Previous by thread: RE: [xsl] ANNOUNCE: Petition to withdraw xsl:script from XSLT 1.1
• Next by thread: RE: [xsl] ANNOUNCE: Petition to withdraw xsl:script from XSLT 1.1
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread