• From: Jonathan Borden <jborden@m...>
• To: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@s...>,Ronald Bourret <rpbourret@r...>, xml-dev@l...
• Date: Wed, 07 Mar 2001 18:55:21 -0500

Simon St.Laurent wrote:

> At 10:09 AM 3/7/2001 -0800, Ronald Bourret wrote:
>
> >It would be nice if the PSVI was factored into multiple categories (e.g.
> >defaults, type information, validation information) and parsers could
> >implement these separately, with applications choosing what they needed.
>
> I'd love to see that, but I'm not holding my breath!  A reasonably clear
> well-formed XML representation of the PSVI might help with some of it,
though.
>
>
to be fair Richard Tobin's XML Schema for the Infoset at:

http://www.cogsci.ed.ac.uk/~richard/infoset/20010216/

includes a PSVI module:

http://www.cogsci.ed.ac.uk/~richard/infoset/20010216/XMLSchema-infoset.xsd

Doesn't this represent a well-formed XML representation of the PSVI?

-Jonathan

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: PSVI
    • From: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@s...>

• References:
  • Re: PSVI
    • From: Rick Jelliffe <ricko@a...>
  • Re: PSVI
    • From: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@s...>

• Prev by Date: Re: PSVI
• Next by Date: Re: URIs and information typing
• Previous by thread: Re: PSVI
• Next by thread: Re: PSVI
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread