• From: "Thomas B. Passin" <tpassin@h...>
• To: xml-dev@l..., Charles Reitzel <creitzel@m...>
• Date: Mon, 05 Mar 2001 19:54:14 -0500

Charles Reitzel writes, doing an admirable job of assimilating all these
contributions -

>
> Doesn't XPointer just use XPath?  In which case, the lib should be able to
> do these things.  I guess this starts getting into XSLT and
> XPointer-specific extensions to XPath.  This probably calls for a couple
> SAX-style extension identifier URNs.  So an app can say "I need XSLT 1.1
> XPath extensions" and the parser can say yes or no.
>
XPointer starts with XPath and then adds extensions so you can specify part of
a node (like part of a text block), or a range of nodes, or combinations.
Easy to picture, infernally hard to deal with when you are thinking in terms
of nice clean node sets.

Cheers,

Tom P

• References:
  • Re: We need an XPath API
    • From: Charles Reitzel <creitzel@m...>

• Prev by Date: Re: XML Schemas: Best Practices
• Next by Date: Re: XML does not work with Netscape
• Previous by thread: Re: We need an XPath API
• Next by thread: Re: We need an XPath API
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread