• From: "Martin v. Loewis" <martin@l...>
• To: sean@d...
• Date: Thu, 15 Mar 2001 23:10:52 +0100

> I have learned the hard way that insisting on round-trippable
> XML/SGML as a base notation for interchange pays dividends.

Without considering the application? If I have a DocBook document, it
might be that processing should not change it "too much". Or, it might
be that changing it is ok as long as the result is "pretty". In "most"
uses of XML, I guess round-trippability is more trouble than it's
worth.

Regards,
Martin

• References:
  • RE: A simple guy with a simple problem
    • From: Sean McGrath <sean@d...>
  • Re: A simple guy with a simple problem
    • From: Sean McGrath <sean@d...>

• Prev by Date: Re: A simple guy with a simple problem
• Next by Date: Re: A simple guy with a simple problem
• Previous by thread: Re: A simple guy with a simple problem
• Next by thread: Re: A simple guy with a simple problem
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread